Wei Kiat's Blog

Anyway, my gp teacher did bring this up in class. She said we shld not judge the whole sex tok base on just the facilitator, and she did show signs of aggreeing that the man facilitator is dogmatic.

It seems that the sch choose this sex tok cos some teachers went for it outside sch and found it useful. And the sch seemed aware its a religious organisation but was told not allow to tok about it in the course.

Maybe thats why the sch wun allow them to make an intro of their organisation during the tok.

From Cygig, SPUG forum. Prehaps thats why we aren't told its a catholic organisation. But failure to do so has far reaching consequences. However, if this is true, we may have critised the wrong organisation. Instead, the school should take the blame. Hmm..

However, the basic truth still remained that certain facts had been distorted or misquoted in the talk. This is still a confusing matter.

This also brings in an interesting question. Should such religious based sex talk be continued in main stream government schools? I would love to see a poll about this somewhere.