Sunday, December 24, 2006
Interesting New AJC Website
Anon alerted me to the fact that the new AJC website design that had been under development secretly since long before June holidays this year is finally up.
I was looking around the website, and notice certain "interesting" content on the site.
Look at
http://schools.moe.edu.sg/ajc/academic/results05.htm
There is censorship of data. From my knowledge, less than 10% of students actually get band 1! This was conveniently left out and not mentioned on its website. Also, 2 A & 2 AO (with General Paper) passes: 95.0%
Wow! Fantastic school! 1 out of every 20 students fail. That similar to 1 A Level failure per class. And that is when AJC "draws from top 5%~15%" of Secondary school graduates? Talk about value addedness =D.
Also compare the 2005 results with that of 2004's
Notice how 3 A & 2 AO (with General Paper) passes and 3 A& 2 AO (with/without General Paper) passes have been quietly left out in 2005? Another case of censorship and not letting your potential students who visit the website to find more about AJC not know about AJC's failure? What an honest website.
Lets go over to this.
I find it amazing that under the Outstanding Achievements of AJ Graduates section, you can see that those achievements or awards were hand over to these AJ graduates many years after they have graduated? Can their achievements be linked directly to effort or success of AJC? I think not. If I become very successful 10 years down the road, will the Pre-School, Primary School, Secondary School, Junior College, NS Platoon Commander, University that I went to claim credit and advertise that they had "produced" such a successful individual like me? In some cases, this is all just bullshit.
Even AJ's AV Technician winning the Best Service Award can be advertised by AJ on its website. This is thick skinned to the core on the part of AJ.
And what's this?
So far I received uncountable copies of the exact same email, asking me to sign up with them, pay a small fee so that I can get this membership card. What a good idea to get people to buy a worthless piece of card that means nothing. There is absolutely no mention on the use of the card in those emails. I'm better off buying a Maplestory pre-paid card. Roughly the same price too.
And also this bunch of "under construction" pages. Whee. Notice how every aspect of JC education is seem by AJC as their "Niche" areas. Please make up your own damn mind. Or is it that AJC is equally bad at every of those aspects?
Wah, on the subject of under construction, someone here must really be sleeping. Knock knock! Wake up!
And here comes my favourite section. I shall post a corrected copy of the list of facilities here.
Finally, here
Count the total number of CCAs there are. It is roughly the same as the number of Clubs and Societies CCAs in RJC.
I was looking around the website, and notice certain "interesting" content on the site.
Look at
http://schools.moe.edu.sg/ajc/academic/results05.htm
PW 2005 Results
84.5% of our cohort of students achieved at least Band 2, against the National Average of 76.9%.
100% of our cohort of students achieved at least Band 3.
There is censorship of data. From my knowledge, less than 10% of students actually get band 1! This was conveniently left out and not mentioned on its website. Also, 2 A & 2 AO (with General Paper) passes: 95.0%
Wow! Fantastic school! 1 out of every 20 students fail. That similar to 1 A Level failure per class. And that is when AJC "draws from top 5%~15%" of Secondary school graduates? Talk about value addedness =D.
Also compare the 2005 results with that of 2004's
Notice how 3 A & 2 AO (with General Paper) passes and 3 A& 2 AO (with/without General Paper) passes have been quietly left out in 2005? Another case of censorship and not letting your potential students who visit the website to find more about AJC not know about AJC's failure? What an honest website.
Lets go over to this.
I find it amazing that under the Outstanding Achievements of AJ Graduates section, you can see that those achievements or awards were hand over to these AJ graduates many years after they have graduated? Can their achievements be linked directly to effort or success of AJC? I think not. If I become very successful 10 years down the road, will the Pre-School, Primary School, Secondary School, Junior College, NS Platoon Commander, University that I went to claim credit and advertise that they had "produced" such a successful individual like me? In some cases, this is all just bullshit.
Even AJ's AV Technician winning the Best Service Award can be advertised by AJ on its website. This is thick skinned to the core on the part of AJ.
And what's this?
So far I received uncountable copies of the exact same email, asking me to sign up with them, pay a small fee so that I can get this membership card. What a good idea to get people to buy a worthless piece of card that means nothing. There is absolutely no mention on the use of the card in those emails. I'm better off buying a Maplestory pre-paid card. Roughly the same price too.
And also this bunch of "under construction" pages. Whee. Notice how every aspect of JC education is seem by AJC as their "Niche" areas. Please make up your own damn mind. Or is it that AJC is equally bad at every of those aspects?
Wah, on the subject of under construction, someone here must really be sleeping. Knock knock! Wake up!
And here comes my favourite section. I shall post a corrected copy of the list of facilities here.
Teaching & Learning FacilitiesSome classrooms with LAN points, visualisers & LCD projectors
Sports & Recreational FacilitiesCompetition-standard athletics track
Other Facilities
Finally, here
Count the total number of CCAs there are. It is roughly the same as the number of Clubs and Societies CCAs in RJC.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]