Wei Kiat's Blog

you seem to imply that the first 2 sites are crap..

well.. it's a different type of approach on the web site design.. i guess http://www.p65.sg is a good example.. they try to make it "cordial" and "closer to the people" by making the design and layout less professional looking.. less daunting to the visitor i guess..

not that i like it that way.. but it's a different direction altogether.. you might not like it but maybe someone else does..

btw i'm an njc alumni.. ha.. not that that matters lol..
 

fuck njc la. school with fucked up pe teachers and bballers who play like girls.
 

Your way of judging schools based on their website designs is extremely shallow. Even though the first two websites clearly demonstrate their website desingers' lack of skills, this is not indicative of the schools' quality of teaching.

AJC is not a perfect school, but there are still good teachers there. Nothing can be perfect. Stop picking on AJC based on such trivial matters and focus more on valid arguments.
 

i nv say anything, other than to ask reader to make their own judgement...
 

i judge schools by the state of their toilets. and i came to a conclusion that AJC is not very good.
 

ajc's is user friendly.
njc's is flash friendly.

but in terms of colour and content. i prefer njc's.

I agree that ajc is not a bad school. If ajc can make some improvements to the facilities and seriously review some of their policies, ajc can be as great as other jcs.
 

meaning u agree that ajc is inferior, or more politically correct, has much room for improvement?
 

the other jcs I referred to are RJC and HCI. NJC is not part of the other jcs I am referring to.

btw, njc do have some (or many) similar traits as ajc according to my friends there.